"Technology" or "software" that arises during, or results from, fundamental research and is intended to be published is not subject to export control regulations. When a project meets the definition of Fundamental Research (defined below), there are no restrictions for foreign nationals working on the project, and no export license would be required for discussing research methods and outcomes.
Fundamental Research is defined as research in science, engineering, or mathematics, the results of which ordinarily are published and shared broadly within the research community, and for which the researchers have not accepted restrictions for proprietary or national security reasons. The techniques used during the research are normally publicly available or are part of the published information.
- Research is not considered Fundamental Research when the laboratory, company, university or researcher restricts the publication of the outcome of the research or restricts the publication of the methods used during the research.
- Prepublication review by a sponsor of university research to ensure that the publication would not compromise patent rights or would not inadvertently divulge proprietary information that the sponsor has furnished to the researchers does not void the status of the research as Fundamental Research. However, if the result of the review is to restrict publication, the Export Control Regulations will apply to that information for which publication is restricted.
- Technology or software resulting from U.S. government funded research that is subject to government-imposed access and dissemination or other specific national security controls qualifies as technology or software resulting from Fundamental Research, provided that all government-imposed national security controls have been satisfied and the researchers are free to publish the technology or software contained in the research without restriction.
- The Fundamental Research Exclusion applies to information and technology; it cannot be applied for export of physical items, such as shipping a pathogen or piece of equipment outside of the U.S.
Regulatory Reference for Fundamental Research
Q.1: What is considered fundamental research under the EAR?
A: The role of the EAR is not to regulate fundamental research as such; it is to regulate the transfer of technology and software. Technology or software that arises during or results from fundamental research is generally not subject to the EAR (see § 734.8 for specific criteria). (Please note: Section 734.8 does not apply to physical objects such as pathogens or equipment.)
Fundamental research is described in the EAR as "research in science, engineering, or mathematics, the results of which ordinarily are published and shared broadly within the research community, and for which the researchers have not accepted restrictions for proprietary or national security reasons." The techniques used during the research are normally publicly available or are part of the published information.
- Example: There is a joint U.K./U.S. university-based research project on vector identification for Marburg virus with no restrictions on publication of the results of the research or of any technology released to the researchers. The research would be considered fundamental and the information resulting from this research, such as the results and methods, are not subject to the EAR. There would be no "deemed export" required for foreign nationals working at the U.S. university and no export license required for discussing research methods and outcomes between the two universities. An export license would be required for the export of the Marburg virus samples to the U.K. university.
Q.2: What types of research are NOT considered fundamental research under the EAR?
A: Research is not considered fundamental research when the laboratory, company, university or researcher restricts the publication of the outcome of the research or restricts the publication of the methods used during the research. The following are examples of research that is not considered fundamental and information that becomes subject to the EAR:
- Proprietary research.
- Any research methods or outcomes of government-funded research that have been specifically restricted from publication. Only the information that is thus restricted would become subject to the EAR; the remainder of the research methods and outcomes that have not been subject to restriction would be considered information resulting from fundamental research.
- Any research methods or outcomes of government-funded research that have been communicated in violation of any condition that may exist in the funding instrument that requires prepublication security review of the research communication.
- Research methods or outcomes that an investigator voluntarily decides should not be communicated widely because of security concerns and therefore self-redacts from publication. Only the information that is redacted would become subject to the EAR; the remainder of the research methods and outcomes that have not been subject to self-redaction would be considered information resulting from fundamental research.
- Example: Government-funded researchers studying Bacillus anthracis accept national security prepublication review of their research. If the group complies with the review requirement and does not communicate this research without the required reviews, their research remains fundamental research. However, any of the information resulting from this research that is restricted from publication becomes subject to the EAR. Research methods and outcomes from the same project that are not subject to restriction would remain information resulting from fundamental research and not subject to the EAR. Decisions to restrict publication, regardless of the source of the decision, would mean that the technology not intended to be published is technology subject to the EAR. This decision is not retroactive, so it would not impose a license requirement for exports of the information that have already taken place, but may impose a license requirement for future exports of the information and future deemed export licenses as necessary.
Q.3: Our internal compliance program uses a slightly different definition of "fundamental research" from the one in the EAR. We use the exact wording found in National Security Decision Directive (NSDD)-189. Do we need to revise our program materials to match the EAR definition?
Q.4: Does BIS presume that research conducted by scientists, engineers, or students at an accredited institution of higher education located in the United States will be considered fundamental research?
Q.5: My research sponsor will review the results of my research before I publish. Does this review affect whether my results are subject to the EAR?
Q.6: Is information given to researchers by a sponsor subject to the EAR?
Q.7: What if our research is government-funded and the government imposes access and dissemination controls on it?
Q.8: My research is not subject to government-imposed access and dissemination or other specific national security controls. Do I need a license for a foreign graduate student to work in my laboratory?
Q.9: Our company has entered into a cooperative research arrangement with a research group at a university. One of the researchers in that group is a national of the People's Republic of China (PRC). We would like to share some of our proprietary information with the university research group. We have no way of guaranteeing that this information will not be released to the Chinese scientist. Do we need to obtain a license to protect against that possibility?
Q.10: My university will host a prominent scientist from the PRC who is an expert on research in engineered ceramics and composite materials. Do I require a license before telling our visitor about my latest, as yet unpublished, research results in those fields?
Q.10.1: Would it make any difference if I were proposing to talk with a Chinese national in China?
Q.10.2: Could I properly do some work with him in his research laboratory inside China?
Q.11: I would like to correspond and share research results, which deal with technology that requires a license to all destinations except Canada, with an Iranian expert in my field. Do I need a license to do so?
Q.11.1: Suppose the research in question were funded by a corporate sponsor and I had agreed to prepublication review of any paper arising from the research?
Q.12: In determining whether research is ordinarily published and shared broadly and therefore counts as "fundamental," does it matter where or in what sort of institution the research is performed?
Q.13: I am doing research on high-powered lasers in the central basic-research laboratory of an industrial corporation. I am required to submit the results of my research for prepublication review before I can publish them or otherwise make them public. I would like to compare research results with a scientific colleague from Vietnam and discuss the results of the research with her when she visits the United States. Do I need a license to do so?
Q.13.1: Suppose I have already cleared my company's review process and am free to publish all the information I intend to share with my colleague, though I have not yet been published?
Q.14: I work as a researcher at a government-owned, contractor-operated research center. May I share the results of my unpublished research with foreign nationals without concern for export controls under the EAR?
Q.15: In a contract for performance of research entered into with the Department of Defense (DOD), we have agreed to specific national security controls. DOD is to have ninety days to review any papers we proposed before they are published and must approve assignment of any foreign nationals to the project. The work in question would otherwise be "fundamental research" under § 734.8. Is the information arising during or resulting from this sponsored research subject to the EAR?
Q.16: Do the Export Administration Regulations restrict my ability to publish the results of my research?